Missing Michael Jackson — The Long View

Posted by Sonja Ebron

These summer electric bills remind me that I need new windows in my home. I still have a few incandescent bulbs to replace, but I’m waiting for them to die. There’s so much going on with energy these days, from the new climate bill to the “pullback” of U.S. soldiers in Iraq, that I’ve been overwhelmed every time I wanted to write.

But losing Michael Jackson has forced me to the keyboard. I’m old enough to remember him as a pre-teen marvel, before he became a cultural icon. Reflecting on his four-decade expression of musical genius, I wonder what we’ll remember in 40 years about the lifestyles we enjoy today. We’ve gone from telephone answering machines to the iPhone, from radio antennas to HDTV, from the Ford Mustang to the Toyota Prius. Michael has left us at the Great U-Turn, trying to be the Jetsons but decked out like the Flintstones.

We’re at the most startling turning point in human history, supporting 7 billion people on resources fit for 2 billion. In 40 years, we will all wonder how we let ANYone drive a Hummer or burn coal to make electricity. The concept of the “job” and the “grocery store” will be gone, and we will know our neighbors well.

But Michael’s is the spirit we’ll need going forward. His exuberant commitment to sharing his God-given talent, even in the face of slander and fear of his grown-man innocence, may give us the courage to share ours in the decades to come. We will need this spirit, cause my new windows and light bulbs ain’t gonna cut it.

  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts

2 Responses to “Missing Michael Jackson — The Long View”

  1. Nora says:

    I could not written it better myself. This is very insightful perspective you have written while paying tribute to an American icon.

  2. r says:

    Waiting for incandescent bulbs to fail is a mistake. The differential between energy consumption of fluorescent and incandescent is so large that the earlier you replace, the quicker the rate of return on investing in fluorescent lights. Do the maths: A fluorescent light bulb costs £1 consuming 10 W, while the incandescent consumes 100 W for the same light output. If the cost is 1p/W, even one day’s consumption of the incandescent is more that the capital cost of the fluorescent! And we haven’t yet discussed LEDs yet!!

Leave a Reply